Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Poetics Today 2004 25(1):91-135; DOI:10.1215/03335372-25-1-91
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Landy, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Duke University Press

Proust, His Narrator, and the Importance of the Distinction

Joshua Landy

French and Italian, Stanford

ABSTRACT

Although it is, in principle, almost universally accepted today that authors and narrators must be rigorously demarcated, somehow scholars of Marcel Proust seem—whether wittingly or unwittingly—to make an exception for In Search of Lost me. Because it is written in the first person and because it incorporates scenes borrowed from Proust's own life, the fictional narrative is routinely read as his thinly veiled autobiography, if not as evidence for any number of psychiatric disorders. At the very least, critics tend to have no hesitation in taking theses put forward by the narrator as Proust's own vision of the world and the narrator's future masterpiece as the Search itself. Now these are not only mistakes, as evidence both internal and external clearly shows, but also consequential mistakes: they prevent us, that is, from understanding how the novel functions and from taking advantage of all it has to offer. For above and beyond the dry, theoretical insights it presents for our consideration, it grants us the opportunity to train ourselves, both in the complicated art of self-fashioning and in the related art of self-deception. And it is only because the narrator's insights do not entirely add up—a weakness, so long as one treats the Search as a treatise—that the implied author can produce the training effect, one which gives his novel its ultimate strength.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poetics TodayHome page
G. Balsamo
The Fiction of Marcel Proust's Autobiography
Poetics Today, December 1, 2007; 28(4): 573 - 606.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Poetics TodayHome page
J. Landy
A Beatrice for Proust?
Poetics Today, December 1, 2007; 28(4): 607 - 618.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Poetics TodayHome page
H. G. Picherit
The Impossibly Many Loves of Charles Swann: The Myth of Proustian Love and the Reader's "Impression" in Un amour de Swann
Poetics Today, December 1, 2007; 28(4): 619 - 652.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2004 by Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics, Tel Aviv University