Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Poetics Today 2003 24(3):413-421; DOI:10.1215/03335372-24-3-413
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kindt, T.
Right arrow Articles by Müller, H.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Duke University Press

Theory and History of Narrative

Narratology and Interpretation: A Rejoinder to David Darby

Tom Kindt

Institute for Modern German Literature and Media Culture, Hamburg

Hans-Harald Müller

Institute for Modern German Literature and Media Culture, Hamburg

ABSTRACT

This contribution discusses the two programmatic assumptions made by David Darby in his outline of the history of narratology or Erzähltheorie (narrative theory).The first is that narratology ought to be remodeled into a contextualist theory of interpretation; the second is that such a "contextualist narratology" necessarily requires the category of the "implied author." By contrast, we argue that the "contextualists" can state convincing reasons neither for a change of narratology's aims nor for a necessary widening of its object domain. Finally, we demonstrate that Darby's thoughts on Wayne C. Booth's concept of the "implied author" are based on the mixing of two definitions of this concept that are in fact mutually exclusive.







  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2003 by Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics, Tel Aviv University