QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chatman, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Parody and Style

Rhetoric and Film, UC, Berkeley

ABSTRACT

This article questions recent arguments that "parody" is the prototypical postmodern genre, an argument which not only goes needlessly beyond the traditional definition of the term but handicaps stylisticians from distinguishing between it and its neighboring kinds of texts. Citing a variety of examples, I repeat Genette's traditional discrimination among strict parody, travesty, satiric pastiche, and pure (or nonsatiric) pastiche. I also urge the importance of distinguishing between these forms and that of satire in general, agreeing with the oft-expressed view that parody often constitutes praise for the original (in Hutcheon's phrase, parody "authorizes" the original). I am concerned that an overly expansive definition of parody may lose the crucial distinction that makes parody so important to stylisticians, namely that well-done parodies (like Beerbohm's of Henry James) are extremely informative about the features that characterize individual styles. I also question whether equating parody with "irony" or "difference" (themselves such problematic terms) helps much in our understanding of it. Finally, I propose that stylistics should not limit itself unduly to the study of forms. Often the most telling clue in a parody is the imitation of subject matter, but subject matter so handled as to point to the preoccupations of the author of the original.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. C. Harry Cheaters: "Real" Reality Television as Melodramatic Parody Journal of Communication Inquiry, July 1, 2008; 32(3): 230 - 248. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. P. Murphy 'Getting rid of that standard third party narrative voice': the development of James Kelman's early authorial style Language and Literature, May 1, 2006; 15(2): 183 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Hall Book Review: The year's work in stylistics: 2001 Language and Literature, November 1, 2002; 11(4): 357 - 372. [PDF]