QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Suleiman, S. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Problems of Memory and Factuality in Recent Holocaust Memoirs: Wilkomirski/Wiesel

Comparative Literature, Harvard

ABSTRACT

This essay explores questions about memory and its relation to historical truth, chiefly through an examination of the "Wilkomirski case," involving a highly acclaimed Holocaust memoir that has now been shown to be a fake. I argue that the categorical distinction between memoir and novel, while not always easy or even possible to determine, is nonetheless important; Wilkomirski's Fragments is neither an authentic memoir nor a novel but a false or deluded memoir. I discuss in contrast to this work a passage from the recent memoirs of Elie Wiesel, in which Wiesel himself revises a fragment of his acclaimed work Night. Such revision enriches both the author's and the reader's interpretations of a life-shattering experience.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?